Exploit Discovery
In this chapter, we’ll dive into how to identify the correct exploit for a vulnerability using resources like SearchSploit, MITRE ATT&CK, and NIST’s National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This process involves pinpointing vulnerabilities, understanding exploitability, and selecting appropriate tools and methods. We’ll walk through three in-depth case studies that illustrate different scenarios in network, web application, and system exploitation, showing how these frameworks can streamline the process of locating and selecting the right exploit.
Key Frameworks for Exploit Discovery
SearchSploit: An offline tool included in Exploit-DB that lets you search through available exploits directly from your terminal. Useful for finding pre-written exploits for known vulnerabilities.
MITRE ATT&CK: A comprehensive knowledge base that categorizes tactics and techniques used by cyber adversaries, linked to real-world observations. Helps in mapping out stages of an attack and finding corresponding methods and tools.
NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD): Contains standardized data on software vulnerabilities (CVEs). Each entry includes information about the severity, impact, and possible mitigations, making it a valuable resource for identifying risks and finding mitigations.
Case Study 1: Web Application Exploitation – SQL Injection Vulnerability
Scenario
A cybersecurity assessment has identified a web application with an SQL injection vulnerability in the login form. The web app uses a poorly coded SQL query that is susceptible to injection attacks.
Steps to Identify and Use the Exploit
SearchSploit:
Query: Using
searchsploit "SQL injection" web application
on the terminal yields several potential scripts, payloads, and methods for exploiting SQL injection.Exploit Selection: Narrow down based on the web app’s technology stack (e.g., PHP or ASP).
Example Exploit:
SQL Injection Exploit - PHP (Login Bypass).
Download the exploit and review its contents to ensure it aligns with the application environment.
MITRE ATT&CK:
Mapping Technique: Using the MITRE ATT&CK framework, SQL Injection falls under the
T1190 - Exploit Public-Facing Application
technique, which is part of the “Initial Access” tactic.Further Analysis: Mapping the technique helps identify related methods attackers may use in conjunction with SQL Injection (e.g., credential dumping after a successful login bypass).
NVD:
Vulnerability Lookup: Check the NVD database for similar SQL injection vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2020-12084). This entry might include severity, associated risk, and potential mitigation or remediation suggestions.
Severity and Relevance: The CVSS score on NVD helps prioritize if this is a critical vulnerability, which aids in justifying the exploit’s importance.
Execution
Once the vulnerability is verified, a crafted SQL payload (like admin'--
) can bypass login. Further, tools like SQLmap automate the attack and extract sensitive information from the database once initial access is gained.
Case Study 2: Network Exploitation – SMB Vulnerability
Scenario
During a network audit, an SMB service on a Windows server (version 2003) was identified as vulnerable. A quick scan suggests this service may be susceptible to an exploit for the MS08-067 vulnerability, a critical buffer overflow in Microsoft’s SMB protocol.
Steps to Identify and Use the Exploit
SearchSploit:
Query: Execute
searchsploit MS08-067
to locate relevant exploits for this known vulnerability. This command reveals multiple options, including Python scripts and Metasploit modules.Exploit Selection: Choose an exploit such as
Microsoft Windows Server Service - Remote Buffer Overflow (MS08-067)
, compatible with Metasploit and non-Metasploit options.Verification: Run a test payload in a controlled environment to confirm exploit functionality.
MITRE ATT&CK:
Mapping Technique: The MS08-067 exploit maps to the
T1210 - Exploitation of Remote Services
technique, useful in lateral movement within a network.Tactical Relevance: The tactic helps reveal related techniques that may support post-exploitation (e.g., privilege escalation using stolen credentials after initial access).
NVD:
Vulnerability Check: Search for
CVE-2008-4250
in the NVD for details on MS08-067. This vulnerability has a high CVSS score due to its critical impact on unpatched systems, reinforcing its exploit’s necessity.
Execution
Use Metasploit with the ms08_067_netapi
module to initiate the exploit on the target IP. If successful, it opens a reverse shell, granting remote command execution. Further privilege escalation techniques can be employed to gain system-level access.
Case Study 3: Credential Harvesting and Privilege Escalation on Linux
Scenario
In a penetration test against a Linux-based web server, weak or reused passwords are suspected. After performing network reconnaissance, SSH is open on a non-standard port, indicating it might be accessible with credential-based attacks.
Steps to Identify and Use the Exploit
SearchSploit:
Query: Run
searchsploit SSH brute-force
to find scripts and tools that perform brute-force or dictionary-based SSH attacks.Exploit Selection: Choose a brute-forcing tool, such as Hydra or Medusa, along with common password lists.
Auxiliary Tools: Consider using tools like John the Ripper or Hashcat if credential hashes are captured during the test.
MITRE ATT&CK:
Mapping Technique: This type of attack maps to
T1110 - Brute Force
, under “Credential Access.” The tool choice aligns with real-world tactics where attackers systematically attempt to gain SSH access through brute-force.Linked Techniques: This approach may also involve
T1078 - Valid Accounts
, emphasizing post-compromise activities once access is gained.
NVD:
Vulnerability Reference: NVD may not have a direct CVE entry for brute-forcing, as this is a general approach rather than a specific flaw. However, searching for default credential vulnerabilities or known weak password lists in services (e.g.,
CVE-2020-7460
for SSH with default credentials) can inform the risk level.
Execution
Using Hydra: hydra -l root -P passwords.txt ssh://<target_IP>:<port>
. If credentials are cracked, a shell can be accessed, followed by privilege escalation attempts (e.g., checking for sudo
rights or SUID binaries).
Tools like LinPEAS
and Linux Exploit Suggester
can be run for potential privilege escalation techniques, further mapping out exploitable paths on the server.
Additional Resources
Exploit-DB: Searchable database of exploits, includes SearchSploit for terminal-based access.
MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Interactive tool for mapping out tactics and techniques by stages of an attack.
National Vulnerability Database (NVD): Tracks all known CVEs, their severity scores, and contextual information.
Each case demonstrates the synergy between these frameworks, from identifying vulnerabilities to selecting the right exploits and post-exploitation activities. Following this structured approach helps ensure systematic exploitation while considering each vulnerability's context and overall attack chain possibilities.
Here’s an extensive listing some common vulnerabilities, corresponding MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and description. Each vulnerability type is associated with its relevant MITRE ATT&CK technique ID (when applicable).
This table covers a wide array of common vulnerabilities with brief descriptions and MITRE ATT&CK references for context. Let me know if you'd like additional details for any of these vulnerabilities or further examples!
Last updated